# CPL Burnout Livrable2 Prototype - Audit

Status: prototype ready for user/external review.

## Files

- Prototype: `/Users/radu/debby_judge_shadow/usine_data/cpl_g1/rewrite_prototypes/burnout/burnout_livrable2_prototype_latest.md`
- Source dossier: `/Users/radu/debby_judge_shadow/ai_coordination/CPL_BURNOUT_HYBRID_SOURCE_DOSSIER_latest.md`
- Source rows inspection: `/Users/radu/debby_judge_shadow/usine_data/cpl_g1/rewrite_prototypes/burnout/selected_source_rows_inspection.json`

## Quantitative Checks

- Word count: 6706 words.
- Paragraphs: 139.
- Unique paragraphs: 139.
- Duplicate paragraphs: 0.
- Sentences checked: 477.
- Duplicate narrative/template sentences: 0. A naive sentence splitter sees repeated bibliography fragments such as journal titles; these are not content-template repetitions.
- Forbidden internal pipeline artifacts detected: 0.

Forbidden scan included:

- `gate`
- `Sonnet`
- `private`
- `finalizable`
- `REF-BURNOUT`
- `[nom`
- `source pack`

Traceability terms intentionally present and therefore not forbidden in this corrected version:

- `DEBBY`, for local source provenance.
- `claims`, for describing KG aggregation and scientific source handling.

## Balance Checks

Term-frequency proxy:

- administrative / intellectual / project / support / telework / digital work terms: 60.
- occupational medicine / SPST / DUERP / CSE-CSSCT / consultation terms: 34.
- healthcare / hospital / patient / caregiver terms: 48.
- actionability / intervention / workload / resources / recovery / arbitration terms: 193.

Interpretation:

- healthcare evidence is present but not dominant;
- administrative and intellectual work is the main target context;
- occupational medicine use case is explicit;
- the text contains practical action levers rather than only conceptual exposition.

## Qualitative Gate

Passed:

- hybrid method documented before writing;
- references displayed as article titles and scientific references, not raw DOI labels;
- exact source count exposed: 11 scientific articles/reviews, 5 local institutional/professional resources, KG as non-article structuring layer;
- provenance annotation page produced: article/chunk DEBBY, KG, expert synthesis;
- no reader-facing claim IDs or pipeline jargon;
- healthcare-heavy evidence framed as transferable mechanisms, not as universal doctrine;
- concrete administrative/intellectual opening case;
- occupational medicine consultation logic included;
- differentiated roles included;
- action sequence and signal map included;
- explicit limits on diagnosis, causality and screening.

Residual risk:

- prototype is not a full systematic review;
- source bibliography is readable and locally traceable, but not yet formatted as a final publisher bibliography;
- a final publisher-level copyedit would still be needed before public release.